May 31, 2023
this.addIframe())}static addPrefetch(e,t,i){const a=document.createElement("link");a.rel=e,a.href=t,i&&(a.as=i),document.head.append(a)}static warmConnections(){LiteYTEmbed.preconnected||(LiteYTEmbed.addPrefetch("preconnect","https://www.youtube-nocookie.com"),LiteYTEmbed.addPrefetch("preconnect","https://www.google.com"),LiteYTEmbed.addPrefetch("preconnect","https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net"),LiteYTEmbed.addPrefetch("preconnect","https://static.doubleclick.net"),LiteYTEmbed.preconnected=!0)}addIframe(){const e=new URLSearchParams(this.getAttribute("params")||[]);e.append("autoplay","1");const t=document.createElement("iframe");t.width=560,t.height=315,t.title=this.playLabel,t.allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture",t.allowFullscreen=!0,t.src=`https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/${encodeURIComponent(this.videoId)}?${e.toString()}`,this.append(t),this.classList.add("lyt-activated"),this.querySelector("iframe").focus()}}customElements.define("lite-youtube",LiteYTEmbed);]]>Minerva Studio/Shutterstock As a journalist, I’m supposed to approach news stories with an unbiased attitude. Just the facts, ma’am. But sometimes, that’s not possible. When it comes to Elon Musk and Neuralink’s desire to implant tech in our heads, I can only say NOPE. HECK…

this.addIframe())}static addPrefetch(e,t,i){const a=document.createElement(“link”);a.rel=e,a.href=t,i&&(a.as=i),document.head.append(a)}static warmConnections(){LiteYTEmbed.preconnected||(LiteYTEmbed.addPrefetch(“preconnect”,”https://www.youtube-nocookie.com”),LiteYTEmbed.addPrefetch(“preconnect”,”https://www.google.com”),LiteYTEmbed.addPrefetch(“preconnect”,”https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net”),LiteYTEmbed.addPrefetch(“preconnect”,”https://static.doubleclick.net”),LiteYTEmbed.preconnected=!0)}addIframe(){const e=new URLSearchParams(this.getAttribute(“params”)||[]);e.append(“autoplay”,”1″);const t=document.createElement(“iframe”);t.width=560,t.height=315,t.title=this.playLabel,t.allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture”,t.allowFullscreen=!0,t.src=`https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/${encodeURIComponent(this.videoId)}?${e.toString()}`,this.append(t),this.classList.add(“lyt-activated”),this.querySelector(“iframe”).focus()}}customElements.define(“lite-youtube”,LiteYTEmbed);]]>[]Minerva Studio/Shutterstock

As a journalist, I’m supposed to approach news stories with an unbiased attitude. Just the facts, ma’am. But sometimes, that’s not possible. When it comes to Elon Musk and Neuralink’s desire to implant tech in our heads, I can only say NOPE. HECK NO. But hey, human trials are just six months away.

I will try, however, to get into the facts of the story with some seriousness. Neuralink, if you’re unfamiliar, is one of Elon Musk’s many companies. And in some ways, you could almost view it as a crossroads between those companies. If Tesla (his EV company) is a technology that we get into, and Twitter (his social media company) is a technology that broadcasts our thoughts, then Neuralink is a technology that gets into us and broadcasts our thoughts.

No seriously. The idea here is that Neuralink will implant an interface device into your skull—and into your brain—that can wirelessly connect to computers. You could then think at a computer to type out messages.

To start…

Read Full Article Source